Re: Licensing concerns (MPL vs. LDP)

[Guylhem Aznar <guylhem@bigfoot.com>]

On Fri, Sep 22, 2000 at 08:36:15AM -0600, Matthew P. Barnson wrote:
>   Please note: Because of current corporate concerns with Bugzilla 
> maintainers, the documentation cannot currently be licensed under the GPL or 
> Gnu Free Documentation License.

What are exactly that concerns?? The GFDL is here to protect both your
rights and your work, not to lessen them.

Consider the OPL -A -B (without options A and B) if you don't want the
GFDL, but I strongly advise you against choosing the MPL.

IMHO it is not a free license and would prevent your work from being
redistributed with the LDP documents, or in a separate 'commercial'
section.

-- 
Guylhem P. Aznar                               http://www.linuxdoc.org
guylhem \@/ metalab.unc.edu                    http://www.iMedecin.com
"They who can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."  -----  Benjamin Franklin


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to ldp-discuss-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org