Johann-Heinrich-Abt-Straße 7
95213
Münchberg
Germany
+49/9251 960877
+49/9251 960878
uwe@bnhof.de
buytenh@gnu.org
Copyright © 2000 by Uwe Böhme
Revision History | ||
---|---|---|
Revision v0.04 | 11 January 2001 | Revised by: U.B. |
Changed Lennert`s Bridge Homepage URL; added NIC to list. | ||
Revision v0.03 | 17 July 2000 | Revised by: U.B. |
Overwork pdf. Download links in doc. | ||
Revision v0.02 | 16 July 2000 | Revised by: U.B. |
Fixed broken graphics in html dsl. Prepared pdf. Typos. | ||
Revision v0.01 | 25 June 2000 | Revised by: U.B. |
Changes name from BRIDGE-HOWTO to BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO (avoid interference with BRIDGE-HOWTO by Christopher Cole) and kill version 1.xx. Lennert Buytenhenk announced as coauthor. | ||
Revision v0.00 | 01 June 2000 | Revised by: U.B. |
Initial Release. |
With developer kernel 2.3.47 the new bridging code is part of the mainstream. There are patches for stable kernels 2.2.14 to 2.2.16, where each is also available as a ipchains-patch.
Copyright (c) 2000 by Uwe Böhme. This document may be distributed only subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the LDP License available at http://www.linuxdoc.org/
Official url is http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/. With developer kernel 2.3.47 the new bridging code is part of the mainstream.
The Bridge-Mailinglist is homed at http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/mailman/listinfo/bridge.
This document has it's official homepage at http://www.bnhof.de/~uwe/bridge-stp-howto/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO/. It's a part of the Linux Documentation Project located at http://www.linuxdoc.org/.
Download Types and Locations
http://www.bnhof.de/~uwe/bridge-stp-howto/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO.tar.gz
http://www.bnhof.de/~uwe/bridge-stp-howto/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO.html.tar.gz
http://www.bnhof.de/~uwe/bridge-stp-howto/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO.pdf.gz
http://www.bnhof.de/~uwe/bridge-stp-howto/BRIDGE-STP-HOWTO.ps.gz
A bridge is a device that separates two or more network segments within one logical network (e.g. a single IP-subnet).
A bridge is usually placed between two separate groups of computers that talk with each other, but not that much with the computers in the other group. A good example of this is to consider a cluster of Macintoshes and a cluster of Unix machines. Both of these groups of machines tend to be quite chatty amongst themselves, and the traffic they produce on the network causes collisions for the other machines who are trying to speak to one another.
The job of the bridge is to examine the destination of the data packets one at a time and decide whether or not to pass the packets to the other side of the Ethernet segment. The result is a faster, quieter network with less collisions.
The bridging code decides whether to bridge data or to drop it not by looking at the protocol type (IP, IPX, NetBEUI), but by looking at the MAC-address unique to each NIC.
Important: It's vital to understand that a bridge is neither a router nor a fire-wall. Spoken in simple term a bridge behaves like a network switch (i.e. Layer 2 Switch), making it a transparent network component (which is not absolutely true, but nearly). Read more about this at Section 4.
In addition, you can overcome hardware incompatibilities with a bridge, without leaving the address-range of your IP-net or subnet. E.g. it's possible to bridge between different physical media like 10 Base T and 100 Base TX.
My personal reason for starting to set up a bridge was that in my work I had to connect Fast Ethernet components to a existing HP Voice Grade network, which is a proprietary networking standard.
Features Above Pure Bridging
The Spanning Tree Protocol is a nifty method of keeping Ethernet devices connected in multiple paths working. The participating switches negotiate the shortest available path by STP. This feature will be discussed in Section 7.1.
Multiple bridge instances allow you to have more than one bridge on your box up and running, and to control each instance separately.
There is a patch to the bridging code which allows you to use IP chains on the interface inside a bridge. More info about this you'll find at Section 7.2.
There is a number of rules you are not allowed to break (otherwise your bridge will do).
A port can only be a member of one bridge.
A bridge knows nothing about routes.
A bridge knows nothing about higher protocols than ARP. That's the reason why it can bridge any possible protocol possibly running on your Ethernet.
No matter how many ports you have in your logical bridge, it's covered by only one logical interface
As soon as a port (e.g. a NIC) is added to a bridge you have no more direct control about it.
Warning |
If one of the points mentioned above is not clear to you now, don't continue reading. Read the documents listed in Appendix B first. |
If you ever tried to ping an unmanaged switch, you will know that it doesn't work, because you don't have a IP-address for it. To switch datagrams it doesn't need one. The other thing is if you want to manage the switch. It's too much strain, to take a dumb terminal, walk to the place you installed it (normally a dark, dusty and warm room, with a lot of green and red Christmas lights), to connect the terminal and to change the settings.
What you want is remote management, usually by SNMP, telnet, rlogin or (best) ssh. For all this services you will need a IP. That's the exception to the transparency. The new code allows you without any problem to assign a IP address to the virtual interface formed by the bridge-instance you will create in Section 6.2. All NIC's (or other interfaces) in your bridge will happily listen and respond to datagrams destined to this IP.
All other data will not interfere with the bridge. The bridge just acts like a switch.
This section describes what you need and how you do to prepare your bridge.
Here you can find a list of the files and down-loads you will need for the setup of the bridge. If you have one of the mentioned files or packages on your distribution, of course there is no need to create network load.
I'll only mention the files for the 2.2.14 kernel. If you want to try a different one (e.g. 2.2.15 or the recent development kernel) just replace the kernel version number and look whether you find it.
Important: You have read the abstract, didn't you? So you know that there is no need to download any kernel-patch if you're working with a kernel later than 2.3.47.
File and package list
E.g. linux-2.2.14.tar.bz2 available from your local kernel.org mirror. Please check first if you find it in your distribution (take unpatched kernel-sources). If you don't, please check The Linux Kernel Archive Mirror System for a close by mirror and down-load it from there.
Note: If your kernel is later than 2.3.47 you don't need this. The bridging is part of the mainstream from that version.
Get the bridge kernel patches for your kernel version from http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/. Identify the file by the kernel number.
Note: There are also patches allowing to work with IP chains. I never tried it, for I don't see the need to fire-wall inside my LAN, and absolutely no need to bridge against the outer world. Feel free to contribute about that issue.
Kernel patches for the stable 2.2 kernel.
Available Kernel patches
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/patches/bridge-0.0.9-against-2.2.18.diff
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/patches/bridge-0.0.8-against-2.2.18pre19.diff
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/patches/bridge-0.0.8-against-2.2.17-0.5.diff
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/patches/bridge-0.0.7-against-2.2.18pre15.diff
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/patches/bridge-0.0.7-against-2.2.17.diff
You also will need the bridge configuration utilities to set up the bridge Section 6. You can also download them from http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/.
Note: If your kernel is later than 2.3.47 you don't need this. The bridging is part of the mainstream from that version.
Apply the bridging patch your kernel. If you don`t know how to do that read the Kernel-HOWTO which can be found in your distribution or at http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Kernel-HOWTO.html
Now it's time we configure our freshly patched kernel to create the ability to bridge.
Run make config, make menuconfig or the click-o-rama make xconfig. Select bridging in the networking option section to be compiled as a module. AFAIK there is no strong reason why not to compile it as a kernel module, whereas I heard rumors about problems with compiling the bridging code directly into the kernel.
Compile your kernel Example 2. Make the new compiled kernel-image to be loaded. I don't know if the kernel patches only apply to the bridging-module or also modify some interfaces inside vmlinuz. So it might not be a error to give a reboot after you updated the kernel-image.
This is how to compile and install from the scratch. Just unzip the utilities-tarball, cd into the newly created directory and give a make.
Example 3. Commands To Compile Your Bridge-Utilities
root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.14 # cd /usr/local/src root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/ # tar xzvf bridge-utils-0.9.1.tar.gz ..... .... root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src # cd bridge root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge # make ..... .... |
After the compilation shown in Example 3 have worked properly, you can copy the executables to let's say /usr/local/sbin/ (at least I did). So the commands you have to give should be clear, but to be complete see Example 4
Example 4. Copy The Binaries Of The Utilities
root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge # cd brctl root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge/brctl # cp brctl /usr/local/sbin root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge/brctl # chmod 700 /usr/local/sbin/brctl root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge/brctl # cp brctld /usr/local/sbin root@mbb-1:/usr/local/src/bridge/brctl # chmod 700 /usr/local/sbin/brctld |
Also now you can copy the new man-page to a decent place, as shown in Example 5.
Make sure all your network cards are working nicely and are accessible. If so, ifconfig will show you the hardware layout of the network-interface. If you have problems making your cards work please read the Ethernet-HOWTO at http://www.linuxdoc.org/HOWTO/Ethernet-HOWTO.html. Don't mess around with IP-addresses or net-masks. You will not need it, until you bridge fully operational an up.
After you did the steps mentioned above a modprobe -v bridge should show no errors. You can check the success by issuing a cat /proc/modules. Also for each of the network cards you want to use in the bridge the ifconfig whateverNameYourInterfaceHas should give you some information about the interface.
If your bridge-utilities have been correctly built and your kernel and bridge-module are OK, then issuing a brctl should show a small command synopsis.
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl commands: addbr <bridge> add bridge addif <bridge> <device> add interface to bridge delbr <bridge> delete bridge delif <bridge> <device> delete interface from bridge show show a list of bridges showbr <bridge> show bridge info showmacs <bridge> show a list of mac addrs setageing <bridge> <time> set ageing time setbridgeprio <bridge> <prio> set bridge priority setfd <bridge> <time> set bridge forward delay setgcint <bridge> <time> set garbage collection interval (11) sethello <bridge> <time> set hello time (12) setmaxage <bridge> <time> set max message age (13) setpathcost <bridge> <port> <cost> set path cost (14) setportprio <bridge> <port> <prio> set port priority (15) stp <bridge> <state> {dis,en}able stp (16) |
The corresponding "shutdown" command is brctl delbr bridgename.
Caution |
brctl delbr bridgename will only work, if there are no more interfaces added to the instance you want to delete. |
The corresponding command to tale a interface out of the bridge would be brctl delif bridgename device
Example 7. Output Of brctl show
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl show bridge name bridge id stp enabled mybridge1 0000.0800062815f6 yes |
Example 8. Output Of brctl showbr bridgename
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl showbr mybridge1 mybridge1 bridge id 0000.0800062815f6 designated root 0000.0800062815f6 root port 0 path cost 0 max age 4.00 bridge max age 4.00 hello time 1.00 bridge hello time 1.00 forward delay 4.00 bridge forward delay 4.00 ageing time 300.00 gc interval 4.00 hello timer 0.84 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 1.84 flags eth0 (1) port id 8001 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.84 flags eth1 (2) port id 8002 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8002 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.84 flags |
Example 9. Output Of brctl showmacs bridgename
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl showmacs mybridge1 port no mac addr is local? ageing timer 1 00:10:4b:b6:c6:e4 no 119.25 1 00:50:04:43:82:85 no 0.00 1 00:50:da:45:45:b1 no 76.75 1 00:a0:24:d0:4c:d6 yes 0.00 1 00:a0:24:f0:22:71 no 5.81 1 08:00:09:b5:dc:41 no 22.22 1 08:00:09:fb:39:a1 no 27.24 1 08:00:09:fc:92:2c no 53.13 4 08:00:09:fc:d2:11 yes 0.00 1 08:00:09:fd:23:88 no 230.42 1 08:00:09:fe:0d:6f no 144.55 |
The Linux implementation currently sets the path cost of all eth* interfaces to 100, the nominal cost for a 10Mbit connection. There is unfortunately no easy way to discern 10Mbit from 100Mbit from 1Gbit Ethernet cards, so the bridge cannot use the real interface speed.
The standard configuration should consist of:
Create the bridge interface.
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl addbr mybridge |
Add interfaces to the bridge.
root@mbb-1:~ # brctl addif mybridge eth0 root@mbb-1:~ # brctl addif mybridge eth1 |
Zero IP the interfaces.
root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 |
Put up the bridge.
root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig mybridge up |
Optionally you can configure the virtual interface mybridge to take part in your network. It behaves like one interface (like a normal network card). Exactly that way you configure it, replacing the previous command with something like:
root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig mybridge 192.168.100.5 netmask 255.255.255.0 up |
A more sophisticated setup script you will find at Example 16.
Important: If you get the terrible experience of a frozen system or some nasty behavior of your nicely shaped linux box at
please try (after the reboot of the system if necessary) before starting any bridge stuff at all a
root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig ethn 0 0.0.0.0If again your system is frozen it's you NIC's driver you have to blame, not the bridging code.
root@mbb-1:~ # ifconfig ethn promisc up
Here we will cover some advanced features of the new bridge code.
Tell me...
You are a networkadmin...?
You have a switch on top of your ethernet tree...?
You have nightmares of a switch emmiting smoke...?
Your company is not extremely rich and con provide another redundant switch just waiting for you to plug the patchwires..?
You don't feel like placing your bed close to your main network node to plug the wires...?
Don't wait until you're just another nervous wreck. Join linux bridge community and enjoy the relaxment a stp-enabled inhouse scenario is offering to you.
Ok, let's leave that commercial and get back linux and the bridge. Take a look on this small thread from the linux-bridge mailing list.
You can just set up two "mirrored" bridges. You have two network interfaces in your bridge? Set up the mirror bridge so that it has two network interfaces as well, and connect each of the interfaces to one subnet. This will work without the need of configuration.
Note: Be sure that you have the spanning tree protocol enabled. If you didn't use brctl, this should be fine, because in Linux, it is on by default. To check, you could check whether the bridge sends a packet to 0180c2000000 every 2 seconds. If it does, the STP is on. The STP is needed so that only one bridge will be active at any given time.
Note: To be able to see nicely formatted stp packages in your network take a look at at the bridge homepage for the patches to tcpdump.
The "master" bridge will send out STP packets every 2 seconds by default. The "slave" bridge will receive these packets, and will notice that the master is still up. If the slave hasn't received a packet in 20 seconds (max. message age parameter), it will start the takeover procedure. From the moment the takeover procedure starts, it will take about 30 seconds (twice the forward delay parameter) for the bridge to become fully operational.
Yes, it works with any number of interfaces. You can invent bizarre topologies to your heart's desire. You can use multiple (redundant) bridge-bridge connects, you can insert loops, whatever. The STP code will always find the minimal spanning tree. The bridge code will even deal with the loss of any number of interfaces. If there are two redundant bridges with identical connections, the loss of an interface on one of the bridges will cause the other bridge to take over forwarding to that specific interface. Now isn't that great? :)
If you think 50 seconds is too much -- and I guess you should; alas, the IEEE specs gives us these default values -- you can tweak these parameters. If you set the hello time (the STP packet interval) from 2 to 1 second, you can safely set the message age parameter to 4 seconds. Then you can set the forward delay to 4 seconds, and this will in total give you a takeover time of ~12 seconds.
The great thing which is made possible by STP is a redundant parallel bridging scenario, with automated take over features. Within a network basing on stp the bridges always try to send a datagram the (by path cost) shortest path. Only on that path the bridges are forwarding, all other paths between this shortest way are blocked. If there is a broken path, the bridges agree about the next shortest. So doubled paths don't break the net, but are bringing more security... For a example setup of a fail secured connection see Section 8.
The normal idea about a bridge would not allow anything like firewalling, but since several people have asked Lennert for ipchains firewalling on bridge forwarding he implemented it.
Important: If you want to do this, you will need to apply the special ip-chain-bridge-patch (also available at the bridge homepage).
As soon you have everything up correctly, the bridging code will check each to-be-forwarded packet against the ipchains chain which has the same name as the bridge.
So.. if a packet on eth0 is to be forwarded to eth1, and those interfaces are both part of the bridge group br0, the bridging code will check the packet against the chain called 'br0'.
Warning |
If the chain does not exist, the packet will be forwarded. So if you want to do firewalling, you'll have to create the chain yourself. |
Example 10. A Simple Bridge Firewall Setup
Example: # brctl addbr br0 # brctl addif br0 eth0 # brctl addif br0 eth1 # ifconfig br0 10.0.0.254 # ipchains -N br0 # ipchains -A br0 -s 10.0.0.1/8 -i eth0 -j DENY |
Caution |
It's vital to have the same name here (br0 or whatever you have selected, as long as you have the same in all places). |
I had to solve a small hardware incompatibility. HP-VG (Voice Grade) 100Mbit network is not fast Ethernet compatible. Having neither the money nor the will to replace the stuff and having the need to expand the system I had to find a solution which was a) stable and b) cheap.
For sure buying a HP modular switch was not meeting condition b). So I remembered I heard about Linux-bridging which automatically fulfilled condition a) and b).
So quite some time ago I successfully set up a bridge between the two incompatible networks. Its first hardware-layout is shown in Figure 1.
It was configured as a transparent network component, meaning it didn't take a part in the network, but only bridged it. Originally it was set up on kernel 2.0.35 from a SuSE 5.3 distribution.
The next problem showed up at once. A single bridge connecting the big segments might be c) a bottleneck and d) a reason to kill the netadmin, if it blows up. So I tried to find some solution for that problem.
What happened next was that I discovered some hints that a new maintainer took over the bridging code. A few mails on the bridge-mailing list later as shown in Section 7.1 I was more clever. The new modular bridging code fulfilled exactly what I was looking for.
The new maintainer: Lennert Buytenhek . His project page can be found at http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge/ IMHO he's doing a great job. Thanks a lot.
The ideas and hints I got from the mailing list discussion shown in Section 7.1 lead to a new hardware-setup shown in Figure 2. The setup is intended to provide a default machine (guess which one). The bridge has 3 HP cards of which each is connected to a HP VG15 hub. The 3com card is connected to a 3com Superstack Fast Ethernet switch.
Figure 2. Hardware Setup Of The Multi bridge Scenario
The practically working setup of my local linux Ethernet multi bridge
This setup is not only fail proof to any one of the bridge's interfaces being down, but also to complete blackout of one of the bridges. Additional advantage to the old-setup Figure 1 that the single HUBS are switched. This means that a datagram being sent from one port on the VG15 HUB blocks 30 ports by maximum and 15 ports by minimum, instead of blocking all 45 ports. Also, the breakdown of the HUB, to the old bridge was connected, would have caused the whole HP-segment to break down. With the new code only the machines connected to the broken HUB will get no more data.
For both bridges the setup is exactly the same (with the exception of bridge priority which will be discussed later on). The machine was setup by the SuSE 6.4 distribution with the original unpatched kernel sources installed. At this point only the minimal configuration and no additional hardware or network setup.
The basic setup is according the descriptions in the beginning of this document. The thing I did in addition was bringing up the unpatched 2.2.14 sources of the SuSE 6.4 distribution to version 2.2.15 as in Example 11.
Example 11. Upgrading The Kernel From 2.2.14 To 2.2.15
root@mbb-1:~ # cd /usr/src/linux-2.2.14 root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.14 # patch -p1 \ /usr/local/download/kernel/patch-2.2.15 patching file ........................ patching file ................... ... .. root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.14 # cd .. root@mbb-1:/usr/src # mv linux-2.2.14 linux-2.2.15 root@mbb-1:/usr/src # rm linux root@mbb-1:/usr/src # ln -s linux-2.2.15 linux |
Next step was to apply the bridge-patch as shown in Example 12.
Example 12. Applying The Kernel Patch
root@mbb-1:/usr/src # cd /usr/src/linux-2.2.15 root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.15 # patch -p1 < \ bridge-0.0.5-against-2.2.15.diff patching file ........................ patching file ................... ... .. |
After that I selected the bridging code to be compiled as a module as shown in Example 13.
Example 13. Configuring The Kernel
root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.15 # make config .. * * Code maturity level options * Prompt for development and/or incomplete code/drivers (CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL) [N/y/?] Y .. 802.1d Ethernet Bridging (CONFIG_BRIDGE) [N/y/m/?] (NEW) m .. |
By the way I also selected the drivers of my NIC's to be compiled as modules which resulted to 3c95x.o and hp100.o.
root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.15 # make dep clean zImage \ modules modules_install zlilo .. root@mbb-1:/usr/src/linux-2.2.15 # init 6 |
After the reboot happening I started at runlevel 1 leaving all the networking out of the running system. That gave me the chance to check the setup step by step.
The command modprobe -v bridge worked without any warnings, so that one was OK. Next I edited my /etc/modules.conf by aliasing my network card drivers as shown in Example 14 and Example 15. I didn't need to make use of the options, all cards where realized proper as I checked by cat /proc/modules, cat /proc/interrupts and cat /proc/ioports.
Example 14. /etc/modules.conf of mbb-1
# Aliases - specify your hardware alias eth0 3c59x alias eth1 hp100 alias eth2 hp100 alias eth3 hp100 |
Example 15. /etc/modules.conf of mbb-2
# Aliases - specify your hardware alias eth0 3c509 alias eth1 hp100 alias eth2 hp100 alias eth3 hp100 |
So next thing would have been a step by step setup of the bridge and it's interfaces. Because I'm lazy I just show the init script I prepared for the setup.
Important: Of course you'll have do adapt the script to your system, if you want to use it. Please remember I'm writing this for the setup of a SuSE distribution.
Example 16. Bridge Init Script
#! /bin/bash # Copyright (c) 2000 Uwe Böhme. All rights reserved. # # Author: Uwe Böhme <uwe@bnhof.de>, 2000 # # # /sbin/init.d/bridge # . /etc/rc.config return=$rc_done case "$1" in start) echo "Starting service bridge mueb" brctl addbr mueb || return=$rc_failed brctl setbridgeprio mueb 0 || return=$rc_failed brctl addif mueb eth0 || return=$rc_failed brctl addif mueb eth1 || return=$rc_failed brctl addif mueb eth2 || return=$rc_failed brctl addif mueb eth3 || return=$rc_failed ifconfig eth0 0.0.0.0 || return=$rc_failed ifconfig eth1 0.0.0.0 || return=$rc_failed ifconfig eth2 0.0.0.0 || return=$rc_failed ifconfig eth3 0.0.0.0 || return=$rc_failed brctl sethello mueb 1 || return=$rc_failed (11) brctl setmaxage mueb 4 || return=$rc_failed (12) brctl setfd mueb 4 || return=$rc_failed (13) echo -e "$return" ;; stop) echo "Shutting down service bridge mueb" brctl delif mueb eth3 || return=$rc_failed (14) brctl delif mueb eth2 || return=$rc_failed (15) brctl delif mueb eth1 || return=$rc_failed (16) brctl delif mueb eth0 || return=$rc_failed (17) brctl delbr mueb || return=$rc_failed (18) rmmod bridge || return=$rc_failed (19) echo -e "$return" ;; status) ifconfig mueb brctl showbr mueb ;; restart) $0 stop && $0 start || return=$rc_failed ;; *) echo "Usage: $0 {start|stop|status|restart}" exit 1 esac test "$return" = "$rc_done" || exit 1 exit 0 |
Note: At least my system it does. Maybe you have to enable the kernel module loader.
Important: In the init script of the backup bridge this line in missing, leaving it with the default priority of 100.
To polish your setup and to be able to reach the bridge from remote you now can configure your bridge instance as if it would be a physical existing network interface. You can give it a nice IP with a suitable net-mask. It doesn't matter from which segment in you net, you will reach the bridge with this IP-address.
Here I want to show and explain about how the running bridge shows up. The output Example 17 of bridge@mbb-1 is the output of the primary bridge, while you see in Example 18 the output of the backup bridge waiting to take over.
Example 17. Status Output Of mbb-1 Fully Up
mueb bridge id 0000.0800062815f6 designated root 0000.0800062815f6 root port 0 path cost 0 max age 4.00 bridge max age 4.00 hello time 1.00 bridge hello time 1.00 forward delay 4.00 bridge forward delay 4.00 ageing time 300.00 gc interval 4.00 hello timer 0.80 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 3.80 flags eth0 (1) port id 8001 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.80 flags eth1 (2) port id 8002 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8002 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.80 flags eth2 (3) port id 8003 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8003 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.80 flags eth3 (4) port id 8004 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.00 designated port 8004 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.80 flags |
Example 18. Status Output Of mbb-2 Fully Up
mueb bridge id 0064.00a024d04cd6 designated root 0000.0800062815f6 root port 1 path cost 100 max age 4.00 bridge max age 4.00 hello time 1.00 bridge hello time 1.00 forward delay 4.00 bridge forward delay 4.00 ageing time 300.00 gc interval 4.00 hello timer 0.00 tcn timer 0.00 topology change timer 0.00 gc timer 2.39 flags eth0 (1) port id 8001 state forwarding designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.42 designated port 8001 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags eth1 (2) port id 8002 state blocking designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.42 designated port 8002 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags eth2 (3) port id 8003 state blocking designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.42 designated port 8003 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags eth3 (4) port id 8004 state blocking designated root 0000.0800062815f6 path cost 100 designated bridge 0000.0800062815f6 message age timer 0.42 designated port 8004 forward delay timer 0.00 designated cost 0 hold timer 0.00 flags |
If you take a glance into /var/log/messages as shown in Example 19 and in Example 20 you can see how the bridges are coming up and deciding how to do their duty. mbb-1 has a lower value for bridge-priority (see ), telling it to try to become the root bridge. As you can see mbb-1 forwards all ports, while mbb-2 blocks all ports with the exception of eth0.
Example 19. mbb-1 Messages From init 2
May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 init: Switching to runlevel: 2 May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: NET4: Ethernet Bridge 008 for NET4.0 May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: device eth1 entered promiscuous mode May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: device eth2 entered promiscuous mode May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: device eth3 entered promiscuous mode May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state May 25 16:46:04 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering listening state May 25 16:46:08 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering learning state May 25 16:46:08 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering learning state May 25 16:46:08 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state May 25 16:46:08 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering learning state May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering forwarding state May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering forwarding state May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state May 25 16:46:12 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating |
Example 20. mbb-2 Messages From init 2
Jun 8 06:06:16 mbb-2 init: Switching to runlevel: 2 Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: NET4: Ethernet Bridge 008 for NET4.0 Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth1 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth2 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth3 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering learning state Jun 8 06:06:25 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state |
To check if really all the promised features are working, I did some crude test. The message logs are shown here in.
I think just taking a patch wire out of a bridge port is a really good real survival test. So I pulled the plugs one by one out of the sockets and looked what happened. To give you not too much tension let me summarize first: It's really working. All the takeovers happened within less then 12 seconds.
The really interesting messages you can find at mbb-2. To see how everything comes up, I stopped network services first. In Example 21 you will see the messages caused by a init 2 followed by a "take out the plug, wait what happens, then place it back" in the order eth3, eth2, eth1, eth0 .
Note: The thing I did, was making the tests, and publishing the dump. The one writing the nice explanations was Lennert again.
Example 21. mbb-2 Message Output Of Bridge Test
Jun 8 06:06:16 mbb-2 init: Switching to runlevel: 2 Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: NET4: Ethernet Bridge 008 for NET4.0 Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth1 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth2 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: device eth3 entered promiscuous mode Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering listening state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:17 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:06:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering learning state Jun 8 06:06:25 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state Jun 8 06:07:15 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 4(eth3) Jun 8 06:07:15 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 8 06:07:19 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering learning state Jun 8 06:07:23 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering forwarding state Jun 8 06:07:23 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:08:51 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:08:51 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:09:22 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 3(eth2) Jun 8 06:09:22 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 8 06:09:26 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering learning state Jun 8 06:09:30 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering forwarding state Jun 8 06:09:30 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:10:09 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:10:09 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:10:10 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: retransmitting tcn bpdu (11) Jun 8 06:10:41 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 2(eth1) (12) Jun 8 06:10:41 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 8 06:10:45 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state Jun 8 06:10:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state Jun 8 06:10:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:11:06 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:11:06 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:11:33 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 1(eth0) (13) Jun 8 06:11:33 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 8 06:11:37 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state Jun 8 06:11:41 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state Jun 8 06:11:41 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:14:18 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 8 06:14:18 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state Jun 8 06:14:19 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: retransmitting tcn bpdu |
Apparently the root bridge immediately acknowledges this tcn bpdu in the next Hello message it sends (the protocol requires for the root bridge to acknowledge it), because this is the only such message we see.
Note: In situations where you see loads of these messages, it means that the root bridge cannot acknowledge them, which probably means your root bridge has a twisted STP implementation.
The root bridge mbb-1 was not so chatty. It only reported some topology changes and propagated them as you can see in Example 22. If somebody can offer a explanation why the root bridge is so quiet in messaging please tell me.
Example 22. mbb-2 Message Output Of Bridge Test
Jun 8 06:06:52 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:06:52 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:07:31 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:07:31 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:07:32 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:07:32 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:08:11 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:08:11 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:08:29 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:08:29 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:09:03 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 2(eth1) Jun 8 06:09:03 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:11:40 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:11:40 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 8 06:11:41 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 8 06:11:41 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating |
One of the other bridges tells us that the topology of the LAN has changed (see Example 21). Well, okay. We will set lower timeouts on our MACC table for a short period of time, and we will propagate this topology change throughout the network.
The ultimate test is of course a total blocking, breakdown or something similar to the root bridge. I did this by shooting down the root bridge by init 1. Next I brought it up again with init 2. Last I pulled all plugs out of the root bridge and waited for some time before I placed them again. In Example 23 you will see the messages from the master-bridge mbb-1, and in Example 24 you see what happened the same time at the backup-bridge mbb-2.
Example 23. Test Messages Of Master Bridge mbb-1
Jun 12 13:35:15 mbb-1 init: Switching to runlevel: 1 Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: device eth1 left promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: device eth0 left promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: device eth3 left promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering disabled state Jun 12 13:35:20 mbb-1 kernel: device eth2 left promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:50 mbb-1 init: Switching to runlevel: 2 Jun 12 13:35:50 mbb-1 kernel: NET4: Ethernet Bridge 008 for NET4.0 Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: device eth0 entered promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: device eth1 entered promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: device eth2 entered promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: device eth3 entered promiscuous mode Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 2(eth1) Jun 12 13:35:51 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:52 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 12 13:35:52 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:55 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:55 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:55 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:55 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: port 1(eth0) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:59 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:39:03 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 12 13:39:03 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:39:05 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: received tcn bpdu on port 1(eth0) Jun 12 13:39:05 mbb-1 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating |
Example 24. Test Messages Of Backup Bridge mbb-2
Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 4(eth3) Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 3(eth2) Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 2(eth1) Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 1(eth0) Jun 12 13:35:21 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:25 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:25 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:25 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:35:29 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:35:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 12 13:35:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering blocking state Jun 12 13:35:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, \ <6>mueb: port 4(eth3) entering blocking state Jun 12 13:35:49 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, \ <6>mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state Jun 12 13:35:50 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: retransmitting tcn bpdu Jun 12 13:38:26 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 2(eth1) Jun 12 13:38:26 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering listening state Jun 12 13:38:27 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 3(eth2) Jun 12 13:38:27 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering listening state Jun 12 13:38:28 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 4(eth3) Jun 12 13:38:28 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering listening state Jun 12 13:38:30 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering learning state Jun 12 13:38:30 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: neighbour 0000.08:00:06:28:15:f6 lost on port 1(eth0) Jun 12 13:38:30 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:38:31 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering learning state Jun 12 13:38:32 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering learning state Jun 12 13:38:34 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:38:34 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:38:35 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:38:35 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:38:36 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 4(eth3) entering forwarding state Jun 12 13:38:36 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, propagating Jun 12 13:39:01 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 12 13:39:01 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 3(eth2) entering blocking state Jun 12 13:39:01 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, \ <6>mueb: port 4(eth3) entering blocking state Jun 12 13:39:02 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: topology change detected, sending tcn bpdu Jun 12 13:39:02 mbb-2 kernel: mueb: port 2(eth1) entering blocking state |
In this section you will find a (for now) very incomplete list of NIC's which are known to work or known to cause problem. For I neither have the money to buy a lot of different NIC's, nor I have any connections to hardware vendors, I depend on your feedback to keep the list accurate. So feel free to mail about success or failure to Uwe Böhme.
Valuing Of NIC Information
Cards I tried and are also reported not to work by other people
Cards I tried or are reported not to work by other people
Cards reported not to work by other people
Cards reported to work by other people
Cards I tried or are reported to work by other people
Cards I tried and are also reported to work by other people
NIC Information
+ +
+ + + Never heard about any problem
- - System hang-up after ifconfig, unable to run promisc mode
+ +
+ +
+ +
Here you will some recommendations which documents you should read before you start to setup a bridge.
Will give you recent information about the bridging code and the bridge utilities.
Describes how to install and configure the Linux networking software and associated tools.
Information about which Ethernet devices can be used for Linux, and how to set them up (focused on the hardware and low level driver aspect of the Ethernet cards).
Here you will find some of the frequently asked questions connected to bridging.
I think a fat 486 or a modest Pentium should be able to keep up with 2x100Mbit pretty well, but I have never tested this. I don't think RAM will matter much (8 or 16MB and all should be fine). CPU will not matter a whole lot either (486/Pentium and all should be fine). I think the primary contributor is the type of bus (ISA, PCI) and the type of network cards (some network cards require less "work" than others). Big switches usually have immensely fat internal buses (3 or 4 gigabits is not uncommon). Standard PCI, for example, can't keep up with a gigabit ethernet cards.
Well, first question is: does it have 100mbit interfaces? If it hasn't (10mbit only), it shouldn't have problems with keeping up, almost regardless of the processor speed. If it does have 100mbit interfaces and you're not sure it will keep up, you can run a flood ping with big packets across it (ping -f -s 1450 ipaddress) and see whether it keeps up.
There are patches for and 2.2.14, 2.2.15. Since 2.3.47 it's in the mainstream kernel, so you don't need to patch. If you're talking about others, you will have to upgrade, if you need to bridge.
Note: I've heared unconfirmed roumors about the 2.2.15 patches working without any change also with the 2.2.16 kernel. Anyone mind telling me about it?